I’m taking a fiction writing class this fall, and the first assignment is to create a story that is “bad”. Being new to the world of writing outside of nonfiction, what does that mean? At least with nonfiction, “bad” is oftentimes simply untrue or unclear. Maybe the logic doesn’t flow or your paragraphs need reordering, but “bad” is arguably more objective in nonfiction writing. What does it mean for fiction to be “bad”?
I started by thinking about writing and story elements that I don’t enjoy. For instance-characters that lack depth, awkward or non-engaging dialogue, or lack of scene setting. Or, in terms of writing-word choice (unnecessary, superfluous, or overuse), awkward paragraph separation, or lack of author voice. These are just some of the thoughts that come to mind.
However, all of these are arguably subjective. My views on character depth may be entirely different than yours, or anyone else’s. Maybe you can picture the scene with only a few descriptions, but I need more information to be able to visualize what’s going on. Even though there are generalized rules for paragraph separation, what if I think there’s a clear need for separation that remains undefined?

I truly do believe that this is a large part of the assignment-the realization that bad stories absolutely can be subjective. Sure, there are standard plot points to pay attention to, or entire equations that set your writing up for success (see Save the Cat! Writes a Novel by Jessica Brody). There simply has to be enough differences from person to person in what they deem “bad” to maintain and increase variation in the world of entertainment.
I am interested to learn what “bad” writing looks like in the eyes of my classmates, both to improve my own and to understand how much we agree or disagree. I would also love to hear from anyone who has strong opinions of their own on the matter or believes in more standardized definitions of “bad” writing that they are interested in sharing. Let me know what you think.














Leave a comment